Does this mean I plan on voting for him?
Hell no. I quit voting.
Got better things to do with my time than register and stand in line on election day to carry out a symbolic gesture that really amounts to nothing but reaffirming the status quo of our Brave New World Order and it's current trajectory.
Yes, I support Ron Paul and his "End the Fed" platform.
But I also believe we would be best served if Newt Gingrich were to become the GOP candidate to face Obama in '12.
Why?
If Ron Paul is exactly who he portrays himself as - a strict constitutionalist and avowed enemy of the federal reserve system - a legit electoral win by him will only end up with the good Dr. sharing the fates of JFK and Lincoln: those who control the fiat currency cartel system will never allow a substantial challenge to their monopoly on manufacturing debt-based money for their profit and our servitude.
I want Newt to be the candidate, because I believe his candidacy would wake up a hell of a lot more people to the reality that our "two-party" political system is nothing more than a charade designed to divide and conquer the masses. He's got plenty of baggage that would make many Social Conservatives stay home in disgust, or perhaps wake up to the truth of our so-called "two-party" system.
In either case, it really doesn't matter.
See, whether Obama or Gingrich "win" the presidency, their victory really represents the only true party in today's system: the Council on Foreign Relations party.
Now just exactly who are the primary founders of the CFR? Why, it appears to be the same folks who helped found the Federal Reserve system.
From John D. Rockefeller Jr.'s Wikipedia page:
"...crucially funded the formation and ongoing expenses of the Council on Foreign Relations and its initial headquarters building, in New York in 1921."
Imagine that.
From Newt Gingrich: Cashing In On His Political Connections
Every administration since Woodrow Wilson has staffed their major cabinet positions with members of the CFR, and Newt Gingrich has been right there since 1990 as one of their most articulate and distinguished members and spokespersons. He was already a member of the CFR for five-years before he became the Speaker of the House of Representatives.
We either vote for the CFR Donkey candidate or the CFR Elephant candidate. In either case, we end up with a CFR President and the CFR agenda continues as it always has.
Vote for change?
Not possible when your only available options all come from the same place.
7 comments:
"If Ron Paul is exactly who he portrays himself as - a strict constitutionalist and avowed enemy of the federal reserve system - a legit electoral win by him will only end up with the good Dr. sharing the fates of JFK and Lincoln: those who control the fiat currency cartel system will never allow a substantial challenge to their monopoly on manufacturing debt-based money for their profit and our servitude."
Yeah, I've always thought the same. Probably any new president, after all the ceremony and pomp are over, is ushered into a room with no windows and told "how it is". And if he decides not to play the game, well, there you have it.
But even if not the case, if Paul wins and he implements even a fraction of his "cures", the MSM will be all over him and the "pain" will be trumpeted and the blame game will begin. The fact that the pain will be substantially worse when everything collapses following the path of all the other candidates is never mentioned.
In any event, I agree with you HL. The ruling elite think nothing of causing wars and economic distress which kills and causes suffering for millions. A doctor from Texas is just a blip on the radar screen.
I disagree.
Given that, as the previous commenter said, only a fraction of Dr. Paul's reforms are implemented, he'll still be able to strenuously exercise his veto power.
There are several more Constitutionalist Republicans running for the house and Senate; this movement needs to start somewhere, and there's no better time than here and now.
To believe otherwise is to be excessively consumed with cynicism. That's a sin, but an understandable and forgivable one. We are certainly up against unthinkable odds and forces, yet the people will always be collectively stronger than the corporate oligarchs. It's simply the belief otherwise that keeps us down.
I personally will do all I can to help Dr. Paul get elected. To act otherwise does nothing but sink further into loss of political voice and agency.
It's not too late, I do believe we can take back our country.
r(Evoluzione) I hope you're right.
Sadly enough, I don't think you are.
Newt Gingrinch. He supports carbon taxes and crap and trade. (schemed up in the White House between Ken Lay and Al Gore). Phony neo-con. The Repubics are slo mo socialists.
Of course he attended the Bilderberg meetings which means he does their bidding.
Karl Marx would not feel too out of place in Washington today. Your finding fathers would not be welcome unfortunately.
Gingrich supports the an increase (??!!) in the intensity of pursuit and punishments in the drug war.
Already, non-violent drug offenders make up half the prison population, and the US has the largest prison population both in total and as a percentage of the population.
Ron Paul is an old guy, and I'm reasonably confident that he's right with God. Perhaps becoming a Holy Martyr would be a good end for him, and he might agree with that. Depending on who his VP is, the situation afterwards could go very very nonlinear, and Ron Paul is nothing but long volatility. In the aftermath of such an event, I don't think even a broad-based revolution would be improbable. I mean, even if it REALLY WAS just a lone nut, who is going to actually believe that?
i was liking Cain. but i KNEW the lib media would torpedo him.
Post a Comment